Client Reviews on Industrial Wastewater Treatment

4.7
★★★★★
BH

Dr. Bobby Hansen

★★★★☆

The membrane bioreactor installation at our pulp mill in Prince George was completed on schedule. After the first month of operation, we observed BOD consistently below 10 mg/L and TSS below 5 mg/L, meeting Fisheries Act section 36 criteria. The chemical cleaning protocol required adjustment during the second week due to flux decline, but the team responded within 24 hours. The sludge production reduction of 30% compared to our previous activated sludge system is already reflected in our monthly operating costs.

2024-11-15 A Review After the First Month
ES

Edward Spinka DDS

★★★★★

Communication during the hydrocyclone optimization project for our gold mine in northern Ontario was clear and structured. The field trials were conducted over three weeks, with daily updates on pressure adjustments and separation efficiency. The final configuration achieved a d50 cut size of 45 µm at 120 kPa, reducing downstream maintenance frequency by 40%. The only constraint was the availability of spare vortex finders, which delayed one trial by two days. The team documented all pressure drop correlations and wear rate projections for the rubber-lined cyclones.

2024-10-28
GB

Graham Blanda

★★★★★

This is our second engagement with the team, following the pH control system installation at our chemical plant in Ontario. The returning client experience was consistent with the first project: the dual pH sensor system with PID-controlled lime slurry injection maintained effluent pH between 6.0 and 8.5 for 99.7% of recorded intervals over six months. The fail-safe bypass logic was tested during a power fluctuation in month four and operated as designed. The sensor calibration protocols provided in the documentation have been integrated into our standard operating procedures.

2024-12-02

Submit a Review

Share your experience with our hydro-technical engineering services. Your feedback helps us refine our wastewater treatment and filtration infrastructure solutions.

Rating: 4/5

Effective MBR System

The membrane bioreactor design for our pulp mill effluent met the specified BOD and TSS targets. The technical documentation provided was thorough, covering flux rates and cleaning protocols. Minor delays in commissioning were communicated promptly.

Rating: 5/5

Hydrocyclone Optimization

We engaged wildflowercases to optimize our sand removal circuit. The field trials were well-structured, and the final configuration reduced our downstream maintenance by 40%. The pressure drop analysis was particularly useful for our operations team.

Rating: 3/5

pH Control System

The automated neutralization system for our chemical plant functions as designed, maintaining pH within compliance limits. However, the initial sensor calibration required more on-site support than anticipated. The fail-safe logic is robust.

Rating: 5/5

Fisheries Act Compliance Audit

We contracted wildflowercases for a compliance review of our discharge operations. The team identified two areas where our monitoring protocols needed adjustment to meet section 36 requirements. Their recommendations were practical and implementable.

Rating: 4/5

Filtration Infrastructure Upgrade

The upgrade to our tertiary filtration system was executed on schedule. The new media configuration improved turbidity removal by 15%. The operational training provided was clear and specific to our plant layout.

Have you worked with us on a project? Submit your review
Cookie settings

We use cookies to keep the site reliable, remember basic choices, and understand which pages are useful. You can accept, reject, or review the settings before continuing.